+44 (0)20 7797 8600


Call: 1999
Lucy Bone



A leading junior, Lucy’s High Court practice straddles commercial and employment work with an emphasis on confidential information, fraud, competitive activity and breaches of directors’ duties. She has particular experience in litigation concerning post-termination restraints and team moves, including applications for injunctive relief and speedy trials. 

With a wealth of experience across the spectrum of employment law including all forms of discrimination and statutory complaints, Lucy frequently acts in the Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal and High Court. High value or complex discrimination and equal pay claims, and whistleblowing complaints are a particular feature of Lucy’s practice. Lucy also has experience of TUPE and collective consultation claims, and industrial relations disputes. Lucy has recently been appointed as Special Advisor to the Equality and Diversity Committee of the Bar Standards Board.

Lucy has a developing expertise in regulatory matters in particular financial services regulation, having completed the prestigious LSE short course on Financial Services Regulation. Lucy is a member of ARDL and sits as a barrister member of the Bar’s Professional Conduct Committee. 

What The Directories Say

An acclaimed senior junior who is praised for her grasp of detail and understanding of commercial reality… A dogged and brave advocate, she will press points even if the judge may not be with her in the beginning: Chambers and Partners 2015

Hailed by peers as a rising force … "She is very effective in cross-examination" "Very organised, she is dependable, calm and articulate": Chambers and Partners 2014

A highly effective advocate who makes her points with great flair … frequently instructed on cases across the employment law spectrum which are of strategic importance to clients: Chambers and Partners 2013

Robust and user-friendly: Chambers and Partners 2012

Really knows her stuff … grasps complex issues incredibly quickly and offers practical advice with genuine enthusiasm: Chambers and Partners 2011

At once effective, charming and confident: Chambers and Partners, 2010 


    Commercial Litigation

Lucy undertakes general commercial work with an emphasis on business protection and unlawful competition, directors’ duties and fiduciary duties. Recent cases include:  

  • Re Proprietary Trading Hedge Fund [2015]: representing the fund against several former traders and a competitor fund re infringement of copyright and misappropriation of trade secrets including trading data and algorithms.
  • Re A Consumer Media Company [2015]: Advising the company following the discovery that one of its directors had used information stolen from a competitor in devising customer lists and marketing strategies.
  • Re A Specialist Underwriter [2015]: advised a specialist underwriter at Lloyds on strategy to neutralize threat posed by former directors who had set up in competition.
  • Clinisupplies v. Karen Park [2012] EWCH 3209 Ch D: represented the Defendant on the 3 day hearing, and succeeded overturning order due to breach of the duty of full and frank disclosure. Resisted application for Norwich Pharmacal relief; obtained costs at the interim stage and 50% payment on account.
  • Gantrade Europe Limited v. Dudman (2012) QBD: represented the CEO of a petrochemical distributor against allegations of fraud, breach of contract and fiduciary duty and monies had and received. Listed for 4 day speedy trial; 
  • Codemasters Software Limited v. Playground Games Limited (2010): led by Charles Samek QC in the preparation of a speedy trial acting for a major publisher of computer games where 18 employees had left and set up a competing business;
  • WCR Holdings Limited v. Steve Morris Associates Limited (2010): led by Charles Samek QC in a £multi-million construction dispute, representing owners in a claim of negligence against architects, structural engineers and construction company.




Lucy is frequently instructed in injunctive proceedings and has extensive expertise in post termination restraints and has been instructed in relation to a range of post termination matters, including fiduciary duties and preparatory steps to compete.

  • Phaidon v. Kostromski [2015]: instructed on injunction raising issues about use of Linked-In and other social media and whether it amounted to solicitation.
  • Berthold Bauer v. Harwood [2014]: obtained injunction and advised on enforcement and committal proceedings on suspected breach of the Order.
  • Whitmar v. Gamage and Others [2013] EWHC 1881 (Ch): acting for the Claimant in this milestone case concerning social media, Lucy won first contested known injunction controlling the Defendants’ use of Linked-In groups and connections. A further point of note is the judge’s refusal to order speedy trial, as the Defendants had not discharged the burden of proving the need for expedition.
  • iPulse v. Murphy, Gilani and Venner Shipley [2013] QBD: acting for two individual Defendants who dispute the enforceability of restrictive covenants as being too wide in scope.
  • Misco v. Total Computer Networks Limited; Misco v. Mpono [2013] Ch D: led by David Reade QC/Damian Brown QC, Lucy acted in two separate injunction applications for the computer software distributor Claimant seeking to protect its confidential information from reaching a competitor firm.
  • Security Management Resources v. Meager [2013] Ch D: represented the Defendant to an injunction application arising from alleged breaches of restrictive covenants. Consent Order obtained including discontinuance and a payment by the Claimant of the Defendant’s costs. 


    Directors' Duties, Partnership and LLP issues

Lucy acts frequently on matters concerning allegations of breach of directors' duties including fiduciary duties. Lucy also undertakes partnership and LLP matters and recently sat on the ELA Working Party consulting with government on proposed changes to LLP members’ tax status. Recent experience includes:

  • Re a Doctor’s Surgery [2015]: drafted defence against proceedings brought by GP for wrongful termination and advised on partner status.
  • Re a Chartered Accountancy LLP [2015]: currently advising the sole director of a corporate member of an LLP on exiting the LLP and setting up a competing business as an individual.
  • Harsco Metals v.  Kirkwood [2014]: advised in relation to breaches of director’s and fiduciary duties in cross border litigation where proceedings had been brought in the USA and a complementary relief sought in the UK.
  • Clark v. (1) Gresham House and (2) Friars Management Ltd (2010): acted for the first Defendant in a claim of breach of employment contract, listed for 6 day trial in the Chancery Division but settled after Counsel-led mediation;
  • Altecnic Limited v. Gizzi and others (2010): represented 3 directors accused of breaches of fiduciary and statutory duties, diversion of business and secret profit.


    Financial Services Regulation

Lucy has a developing disciplinary and regulatory practice and particular interest in financial services regulation reflecting her City-focussed client base. Lucy completed the LSE short course on Financial Services Regulation in May 2015, covering all aspects including Conduct of Business, APER and Senior Manager Regime, Remuneration Code, Money Laundering, Market Abuse and Retail Consumer Protection. Her recent experience includes:

  • Re a Trader at International Bank [2015]: Advising a trader who is regulated but not without significant influence function on his suspension and the Bank’s investigations in relation to c£50m trading losses.
  • Re Insurance Investment Fund [2015]: Advising the fund on appropriate strategies including possible FCA notification in relation to suspected misconduct by Approved Person.
  • Re Retail Financial Services Provider [2015]: instructed by a financial services provider working with retail outlets following a team move. Advised on potential claims, damages and negotiations generally.
  • De Seliva v. HSBC [2015] Advising on alleged mis-selling of shares and potential action in court following unsuccessful complaint to FCA. 
  • Wilson v. Praemium Financial Services [2013]: Successfully defended an investment management company in a whistleblowing claim involving alleged breaches of FSA regulatory requirements. Claim brought by former compliance officer.


    Disciplinary & Regulatory

Lucy has a developing disciplinary and regulatory practice. She accepts instructions in relation to investigations and internal disciplinary hearings, both chairing and representing, and has experience of appeals of regulatory decisions with recent experience including:

  • Investigation into Sexual Harassment and Assault by QC [2015]: advised on steps to be taken in investigating a conduct complaint brought by pupil.
  • Re a Private School [2015]: instructed by the family of a 13 year old boy suspended then excluded for alleged drug taking. Advised on injunctive relief and negotiations generally.
  • Consultant Urological Surgeon v. Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust [2015] Advising doctor accused of malpractice and misconduct, including parallel employment tribunal proceedings and GMC reference. 
  • Consultant Gynaecologist v. NHS Trust [2013-2014]: acted (with Jeff Bacon) in an internal disciplinary matter for a consultant gynecologist facing 350 charges of malpractice. Advised on issues arising from GMC proceedings. Represented at hearing and successful in achieving a conditional return to work.
  • Payne v. General Optical Council [2013]: acted for the GOC in resisting the appeal against refusal of student registration where the student had been convicted and imprisoned in Brazil for attempted drug trafficking.
  • Fitzgerald v. General Dental Council [2013]: succeeded in this registration appeal which saw a Dentist who suffers from multiple sclerosis be admitted onto the Specialist Care Register. Lucy argued that the GDC should make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 in assessing the Dentist against the guideline criteria for registration. 
  • Guryokvits v. General Dental Council [2013]: advised a Dentist on prospects of appealing to the High Court the GDC’s decision to strike him off as unfit to practice.


    Employment and Discrimination

Lucy is a Band 3 Employment Junior in Chambers and Partners, and known for her comprehensive experience of all aspects of tribunal claims, particularly high value claims. Frequently acts in cases unfair dismissal including Public Interest Disclosure dismissals. Her experience of direct and indirect discrimination claims extends to all forms of discrimination, and Lucy has regular experience of high value claims, in the public and private sectors. Particular experience of note includes:
  • Dimitrakov v. Student Loans Company [2015]: successfully defended against claim for discrimination in the provision of services and breach of human rights following racial profiling in a fraud crackdown.
  • Re a Christian Charity [2015]: defending well-know Christian charity against discrimination claim from employee who sent indecent photos to female associate.
  • MacFarlane v. Berrymans [2015]: Successfully defended well-known firm in high profile dismissal of partner for misleading the Court.
  • Mann v. Siemens Limited [2014] Acted for the Claimant in highly charged claim of race discrimination brought by Jewish woman against major German firm Siemens. Cross-examined several members of Siemens’ board and its Attorney General.
  • Steptoe v. Hertfordshire Constabulary [2014]: successfully represented the Police in disability discrimination complaint.
  • Colomar-Mari v. Thomson Reuters (2013): successfully resisted appeal to EAT on question of when repudiatory breach is waived by conduct.
  • Webber v. NHS Direct (2013): appeared on appeal to EAT concerning the construction of a Pay Protection Policy and whether it amounted to compensation for loss of office;
  • K+L Gates v. Edelman (2013): appeared for the appellant on appeal to EAT against preliminary ruling to permit the claim out of time;
  • Lodge v. Financial Times (2012): acted for the FT in a highly publicized case with evidence given by the Editor and several members of the Board.
  • Pesa v. Morgan Stanley (2012): acted for the Claimant trader in a high-value sex and maternity discrimination complaint against this major bank.